Urbanization and The Environment
The growth of industries and the policies governing their location both, have set in motion powerful forces of urbanization in the State.
Of the
estimated population of 48.97 million for the year 2001, as much as 37.68% live
in its more than 225 urban agglomerations,
consisting of 6 municipal corporation, 21 class I, 27
class II and other small towns. While the decadal growth rate of the urban
population came down from 41.42% during 1971-1981 to 34.38% during 1981-1991,
the projections about the growth in absolute numbers in the coming twenty years
is, to say the least, frightening. The total population of the State is expected
to grow to 62.80 million by the year 2021 from the estimated 48.97 million in
2001. During the same period urban population is projected to increase from
14.24 million [37.68%] to 27.92 million [44.46%]. The implication is that
virtually the entire increase in the total population in the State, during the
next 20 years, will have to be accommodated in the urban areas
alone.
Already 51.47% of the total urban population lives in the six municipal corporation towns of Ahmedabad, Vadodara, Surat, Rajkot, Jamnagar and Bhavnagar. Ahmeadabad alone accounts for roughly a quarter of these [census 1991].
Urban population concentration taluka shareTwo clear trends are discernible as far as urban growth is concerned. The first, is the alarming rate of growth of the peripheral areas at 81.02, 56.30 and 115.48 per cent respectively in the corporation, class I and class II towns during 1981-1991, a trend which is continuing unabated. The other, is the emergence of the north south and the coastal corridors, which take the major share of the urbanization process in their various nodes, giving rise to a large number of urban industrial clusters.
The high degree of urbanization coupled with industrial growth has already made its adverse impact on the physical quality of life in urban areas and also on the natural environment.
The environmental problems of the urbanization process arise out of the patterns of resource consumption and disposal by the urban population and are enumerated below.
Depleting and deteriorating water supply sources
About 87% of the municipal towns depending exclusively on ground water resources. Insufficient per capita availability and poor coverage of the population characterize provision of urban water supply. While the six municipal corporation towns have better coverage varying between 67-98%, the per capita availability varies between 100-135 lpcd against the norm of 160 lpcd. In other towns the coverage varies between 56-59% and availability varies between 70 –102 lpcd against applicable norms varying between 100-140lpcd. [Annexure-VII].
Intermittent supply, old and rusty supply systems, poor cost recovery, minimal investment and depletion of source and deterioration of quality [including pollution] are the other pronounced features of urban water supply scenario in the State. In Ahmedabad alone, close to 10% samples fail bacteriological test during the monsoon period.
|
Water Charges : How much are consumers willing to pay ? |
|
In 1995, households in Vadodara, with incomes below Rs. 1500 per month were willing to pay upto Rs. 275 per annum for a reliable services (as against the then prevailing payments of about Rs 43) while wealthier families with monthly incomes between Rs. 4500 to 6000 were willing to pay up to Rs. 440 (prevailing charges around Rs. 200). Source : DFIE Field NTC, June 1999 |
| Water charges and cost of supply – Vadodara Municipal Corporation | ||||
|
Year | ||||
|
1985-86 |
1987-88 |
1989-90 |
1992-93 | |
|
Cost Rs./ KL (O&M) |
0.62 |
1.12 |
0.98 |
1.49 |
|
Cost Rs./KL (Total) |
0.91 |
1.17 |
1.40 |
2.32 |
|
Revenue (Rs./KL) |
0.27 |
0.68 |
0.63 |
1.24 |
|
Source : Vaidya, Chetan (1995), Study on willingness to pay for water, sanitation service-case study, vadodara (mimeo) | ||||
| Water Account Deficits – Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation | ||||||
|
Description |
91-92 |
92-93 |
93-94 |
94-95 |
95-96 |
96-97 |
|
Income |
16.51 |
18.04 |
26.27 |
39.66 |
57.84 |
39.80 |
|
Expenditure |
65.81 |
69.89 |
84.03 |
82.35 |
92.55 |
100.83 |
|
Difference |
-49.30 |
-51.85 |
-57.76 |
-42.69 |
-34.71 |
-61.03 |
|
Ratio Inc/exp. |
0.25 |
0.26 |
0.31 |
0.48 |
0.62 |
0.39 |
|
Source : Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation | ||||||
Poor underground drainage
The underground drainage system covers only between 16% to 37% of the urban towns while in the corporation towns the coverage extends up to 76%. [ Annexure-VIII A & B]
|
Accumulation Of Solid waste |
![]() |
Poor management of solid waste
In the corporation towns, between 7-40% of the solid waste is not cleared on a daily basis. [Annexure-IX]
Proliferating Slums
The urban population living in slums ranges between 14.3-24.9%.
Poor sanitation
As much as 33.03-53.55% of the population do not have sanitation facilities in the various classes of towns leading to large-scale open-air defecation.
|
Annual health impacts and damages which can be avoided through the provision of clean water and sanitation | ||
|
DALYs reduced (millions) |
Value of reduced DALYs (billions US$) | |
| Lowest range (based on x=0.9 h=0.8) |
10.60 |
$2.287-6.203 |
| Highest range (based on x=0.5, h=0.6) |
17.90 |
$3.842-10.420 |
| Average across six sets of assumptions |
14.30 |
$3.076-8.344 |
|
Note: DALY’S: Disability Adjusted Life Years Source : The cost of inaction : Valuing the economy-wide cost of environmental degradation in India (World Bank) : 1995 | ||
Urban air pollution
Poor urban transport facilities have led to a phenomenal growth of vehicular population in the state form 0.45 million in 1981 to 5.19 million [as on 31 March, 2000]. Most of these are two stroke engines causing severe air pollution.
Major pollutants emitted by motor vehicles include carbon monoxide (CO), respirable particulate matter [PM10], NOx, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons [PAH], lead (P6) and volatile organic compounds. Regular monitoring of these pollutants, except NOx are not being conducted.
Levels of SPM are reportedly higher than permissible in the towns of Surat, Rajkot, Jamnagar [Sikka], Ankleshwar, Morbi, Limdi, Dhrangadhra and Palitana. Concentration of NOx beyond tolerable limits are reported from Dahod, Vapi, Baroda, while more than permissible levels of SO2 is reported from Morbi, Khambhat, Petlad, Ankleshwar, Vapi, Baroda and Ahmedabad.
|
Annual incidence and health costs due to ambient air pollution levels exceeding WHO Guidelines in 36 India Cities (using data from 1991-92) | ||
|
Physical Impacts |
Value of the impact (US$ millions) | |
| Premature Deaths |
40,351 |
$170-1.615 |
| Hospital Admissions and sickness Requiring Medical Treatment |
19,800,000 |
$25-50 |
| Minor Sicknesses (including Restricted Activity Days and Respiratory Symptom Days) |
1,201,200,000 |
$322-437 |
|
Total |
$517-2.102 | |
|
Source : The cost of inaction : Valuing the economy-wide cost of environmental degradation in India (World Bank) : 1995 | ||
Health effects of PM1O
Particulate matter is the term given to the tiny particles of solid or semi-solid material found in the atmosphere. Particulate matter of 10 micrometers in diameter and less which would be invariably inhaled is commonly called PM10.
PM10 particulate, are generally created during burning process and include fly ash (from power plants), carbon black (from automobiles and diesel engines), and soot (from fireplaces and wood stoves). The PM10 particulate from these sources contains a large percentage of elemental and organic carbon which play a major role in haze phenomena and health effects.
|
Effects |
Exposure levels- annual concentration | |
|
For possible effects |
For likely effects | |
| Reduced lung function in children | 140 ug/M3 | 350 ug/M3 children |
| Increased mortality | 350 ug/M3 | 600 ug/M3 |